Defenses to Prostitution Cases in DC
Often times, someone arrested for solicitation in the District of Columbia will claim to have been entrapped. And with the experience the attorneys at Scrofano Law PC have had in defending cases in DC Superior Court, it often appears that they were. However, the defense of entrapment has been watered down over the years and the DC Courts have made it more and more difficult to successfully assert entrapment as a defense.
The defense requires the defendant to put forward some evidence that the police induced the defendant to commit the crime. Such evidence must show that the government used some coercion or fraudulent inducement to get the individual to do it. In addition, the defendant must show that he or she would not have committed the offense but for the police’s improper inducement.
Another defense to solicitation is to claim that the undercover and the arrestee never had a meeting of the minds. This could involve disputing the undercover’s version of events or even claiming that the defendant was not sincere in agreeing to exchange sex for money.
Other ways to challenge a solicitation arrest involve litigating discovery issues and attempting to get the case thrown out where the government violates its discovery obligations. Under the law, the prosecution is required to produce certain information to the defense. These requirements include any and all statements made by the defendant and even includes the personnel file of the arresting and/or undercover officer. There are also often notes the undercover and arresting officer take that the government is required to produce. Finally, the government must also produce all radio communications related to the arrest.